TRIBUNAL WON’T PUT A STOP TO SHODDY JOURNALISM

I usually don’t get too concerned when man-child Julius Malema opens his chubby mouth and spews forth another of his pearls of wisdom. But when he smugly declared there is no need for debate around the proposed media tribunal because “we have already decided”, I got scared. Really scared.

This time Juju’s outbursts can’t be dismissed as the follies of “youth” because he’s simply gloating about the fact that the ANC’s top brass has already made up their mind. This much has been made clear by the party’s chief spin-doctor, Jackson Mthembu, who dismissed editors’ concerns over the tribunal by telling them it’s just the thing us hapless hacks need to control unruly journalists who are hell-bent on muckraking instead of reporting the truth.

The president himself made it crystal clear where the party stands when he said journalists need to be governed by a tribunal because “at times they go over-board on the rights”. And, just in case there was still any doubt about where this is all heading, Zuma summed it up succinctly by letting us know government considers itself — and not the media — to be “the watchdog of the people” because “they (the media) were never elected”.

To say these are worrying statements is a gargantuan understatement. But what I find most offensive about all this is how Mthembu and his colleagues have repeatedly argued that “ordinary people” have been calling on government to clamp down on us pesky press.

Don’t believe it for a second; this is spin-doctoring at it’s worst. The issue that Mthembu and co are trying to manipulate to their self-serving benefit is complaints over sub-standard journalism practices. I’ll be the first to admit there are pockets of journalists whose shoddy reporting shames the profession, and no one in the media is really trying to deny that.

But a draconian style tribunal won’t solve this, only more and better training will. If government is truly concerned about the standard of journalism, how about some no-strings attached funding for media training courses and internship programmes?

The ANC’s also been lobbying for the tribunal under the pretence that we need it to deal with corrupt journalists who are abusing their “power” (I won’t even go into the obvious irony here).

Sure, there are some rotten apples — like there are in any industry — but they’re few and far between and are rooted out pretty quickly. Just ask former Cape Argus journalist Ashley Smith, who admitted to accepting bribes to write favourably about former Western Cape premier Ebrahim Rasool. Smith was swiftly ostracised by the industry and his former employer, the Argus, led the reporting on his downfall, even though it was a painfully embarrassing affair for the paper.

Besides, there are existing structures in place to regulate errant journalists, and these structures do work. For example, at roughly the same time as Sunday Times journalist Mzilikazi wa Afrika was being frogmarched to a squad of police cars and detained on bogus charges, the press ombudsman ruled that City Press should apologise to ANC treasurer general Mathews Phosa for not giving him sufficient time to respond to allegations.

The fact is government isn’t fooling many with the pack of weak excuses they’re using to justify the need for a media tribunal and the equally worrying Protection of Information Bill.  I mean, come on, is anyone really gullible enough to think this is anything but a ballsy attempt to muzzle the watchdog so it doesn’t bark while the house (of parliament) is being vandalised and looted?

Melany Bendix
Editor

SA MEDICAL AID: ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU SICK

For the past five months I’ve been living in fear that some horrible illness or accident is going to befall me. Every time I walk out of my front door, I look over my shoulder expecting that Murphy guy to come along and trip me up with his law of inevitability.

The reason for all this paranoia? I’ve let my medical aid policy lapse. I was meant to switch over to a new one, but just couldn’t bring myself to sign on the dotted line to fork over close to R900 a month for a basic hospital plan just in case something nasty happens to me.

So I decided to just wing it. After all, what are the chances of me having to go into hospital for the first time in my life? But, every day, as my paranoia grows, the odds seem to be stacking up against me, and embellished visions of being stuck in the snaking queue of a government hospital, while bleeding to death, keep plaguing me.

And therein lies the rub: we know we’re being extorted by the medical aid cartel, as I like to call them, but those of us who’ve been fortunate enough to never have suffered through the floundering state health system are just too damn scared of the alternative. So we hand over the dosh, month after healthy month.

Overly dramatic paranoid visions aside, I truly believe the majority of doctors and nurses working in state clinics and hospitals are competent, caring, dedicated and by no means offer sub-standard care. But the harsh reality is that there are only just over 33 000 doctors caring for our population of 49 million-plus people, more than 80% of whom use public health facilities. It doesn’t take a mathematician to work out that that they are radically overburdened, and the natural result is long snaking queues and, in some cases, sub-standard care.

Government also seems to be aware of this painful reality, and I imagine that’s part of the reason it’s planning to implement a national health insurance (NHI) scheme for South Africa. I, for one, love the idea. Free, comprehensive and efficient healthcare for everyone. No day-long queues; free medication, no more dental bills and, for me, no more paranoia.

That’s the idea on paper, but the more you look at the facts and figures, the more government’s great NHI dream starts looking like exactly that — a dream.

So what’s the solution to upgrading the standard and access to public medical care for the majority of South Africans who can’t afford exorbitant private care? I honestly don’t have any vaguely wise thoughts on this, but I’m hoping Brendon Bosworth’s intensively researched article on a NHI for South Africa in the latest edition of The Big Issue will open up a much-needed and meaningful debate around this crucial topic.

Go check it out, and please let me know whether or not you think a NHI scheme could be the solution to my medical aid dilemma.

Melany Bendix
Editor

THE WHEELS OF JUSTICE CAN BE GREASED TO SPIN QUICKLY

Two weeks into the World Cup, I lost a bit of my gees. No, it wasn’t because Bafana Bafana was knocked out of the tournament – their whipping of the petulant French team made up for the early exit. Rather, my rose-tinted World Cup glasses lost some of their sheen when Fifa laid criminal charges — later withdrawn — against the two Dutch women accused of leading the orange mini-clad “Bavaria babes” into an ambush marketing stunt.

What really irked me about the ridiculousness of all this was that the charges were processed at supersonic speed via one of the 56 special courts set up specifically to deal with World Cup-related crime. These are the same courts that took less than 48-hours to prosecute a Nigerian guy who was caught with 30 “illegal” tickets and sentence him to three years in jail without the option of a fine!

I realise it was important to have courts that could quickly process cases where foreign tourists were involved before they left the country, and of course South Africa had to show the world how tough we were on World Cup crime. But — and I’m sure I’m not alone on this — I don’t consider the flouting of Fifa’s cash-cow brand and ticket scalping serious enough crimes to warrant a hearing in the highly costly special courts.

In fact, I find it pretty insulting that our government reckons it’s more important to fast-track an ambush marketing charge than, say, a rape or murder charge. What sort of message does it send out to the victims of these crimes who wait year after agonising year for the criminals who raped them or murdered their loved ones to be prosecuted, only for that elusive docket to “go missing” or the case to be postponed yet again? And what about the rights of awaiting trial prisoners — some of them innocent — too poor to post bail, who languish in jail for years only to have their cases dismissed for lack of evidence?

Here’s the real stinger: We, the South African taxpayers and not Fifa, paid for the privilege of being able to prosecute World Cup-related crimes, many of them petty, ahead of the backlog of serious criminal cases clogging up our normal court rolls. We paid dearly. R45 million, to be precise.

I could be like one of those the-country’s-gone-to-the-dogs types and rant on and on about this, but it’s a bit like crying over spilt milk, not to mention embarrassing. So, looking forward instead: now that the ball is over and we’ve packed away the vuvus, taken the flags off the cars and removed ourselves from the world’s eye, what are we left with?

Cape Town’s gained quite a few excellent long-term legacies from this mammoth event, but to me, the legacy with the greatest potential is that we all now know what our leaders can do when they have the will to do so.

We’ve been shown that the wheels of justice can be greased to spin very quickly. We’ve also experienced the joys of walking around the city at night with no fear, how drinking and driving is thought about twice when there are squads of traffic officers on the roads, and we’ve had a taste of what it’s like to travel on safe, efficient public transport.

Our eyes have been opened up to the potential, so the question is, what are we going to do with it?

Melany Bendix, Editor

WORLD CUP MANIA: TALKING ABOUT CULTURE

Culture is on everybody’s lips. Another game at the fan park: Spain vs Switzerland, if I remember correctly. Cold beer in hand, I am engaging in conversation with a middle-aged gentleman about the World Cup vibe. It’s a chilly, grey day and the sparse crowd is quiet, subdued, passively absorbing Spain’s demise. Minutes later, a group of about 10 or so excited Bafana Bafana supporters congregate in my vicinity and start generating some gees. They sing popular local songs in isiXhosa, and blow their vuvuzelas in time to the tune, all the while drawing foreign bystanders into the enticing rhythm.

The scene is priceless and I remark that once people get hold of vuvuzelas they go mad. “Ja, ma wat kan jy doen is os culture”, [Yes, but what can you do, it’s our culture], he replies curtly. “A culture van geraas maak en tekeere gaan?” [A culture of making a noise and showing off], I cheekily quip. “En Party” [And partying], he adds, and we both laugh.

Just then an excited female South African fan comes bounding by, blasting her vuvuzela wildly past the gentleman’s face. “Blaas it in’ie lig, nie in ons gesigte nie” [Blow it up in the air, not in people’s faces] he complains. “Haybo Mr, this is South Africa, vuvuzela is our culture,” she retorts.

This notion had been pointed out to me some days before already when I approached an elderly lady to find out how she felt about vuvuzelas and the idea that it was an African thing. “My boy, [the vuvuzela] is our culture. You must be proud. This is your inheritance. This is what we struggled for during apartheid,” she emphatically declared.

Outside of the fan park, the word culture is inescapable, featuring daily in the print and digital media, in advertisements and in the conversation of everyday, ordinary people. And in most cases these discussions about culture probably had to do with vuvuzelas. This little plastic horn, in the context of all the media attention during the World Cup, has really got South Africans talking about national culture and cultural identity.

The incidents cited above highlight three of the most common ways the vuvuzela elicited the word culture amongst the South African public. In the first instance, culture is something that is to be put on display, on show, out in the public, as a mark of the nation’s cultural distinctiveness. Secondly, culture is invoked as a means of defense when questions about the legitimacy or tastefulness of certain beliefs and practices are raised. Thirdly, culture is something which cannot be explained but its existence is always beyond question.

The way people talk about culture here is not unique, but it is really interesting because, since the fall of apartheid, South Africans have struggled to forge a truly united national identity. During this time, sport has emerged as one of a few common denominators that touch the hearts of South Africans from all walks of life. This has lead many to suggest that the World Cup has been a real plus for helping to unite the nation. As a friend of mine remarked, seeing the number of South Africans in the stadiums out to watch the games, suggested to him that the kind of togetherness the tournament fostered is priceless.

All this engagement with and about culture does have its drawbacks. Since the start of the World Cup there has been an outbreak of a condition known as vuvuzela lips — a particular cracking and swelling of the front, centre lip tissue, not unlike a bee sting, that results from excessive, rapturous blasting of the horn. Like I said at the beginning, culture is on everybody’s lips.

— Duane Jethro

Duane Jethro is a PhD Student at the Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology of VU University Amsterdam. His research focuses on post-apartheid cultural heritage initiatives.

SUCK THE MARROW OUT THE WORLD CUP BONE

When South Africa beat the All Blacks to win the 1995 Rugby World Cup, I was passed out, somewhat drunkenly, on my mate’s couch in her Plumstead flat, the black and white New Zealand flag I had rebelliously painted on my cheek smudged into a blurry blob.  I woke up briefly when the packed room broke into wild cheers, mumbled a profanity or two before surreptitiously attempting to wipe the black facepaint off the couch, rolled over and went back to sleep. In short, I had vok-all gees.

Fast-forward to 2007. I’m older and, of course, infinitely wiser — and hopefully a tad classier too. But I still don’t care much about rugby, or any sport for that matter. Despite this, I ended up at a Rugby World Cup braai on the night of the final held in France, fortunately with a bunch of people who were equally as clueless about the game as I am. We watched the match on a giant screen and all gleefully cheered — prompted by the on-screen audience — when “our boys” kicked some pommy butt.

All good fun, and I was happy when the Bokke won. But this was nothing in comparison to what I would feel next when those great big galumphs of men spontaneously lifted then president Thabo Mbeki onto their burly rugby-playing shoulders, making the austere prez look painfully vulnerable in his out-of-bookish-character Springbok jersey.  As the awkward little man balanced precariously on top of the scrum, I, quite unexpectedly, felt a surge of national pride welling up from the depths of my belly, a feeling so strong that my shocked system didn’t know what to do except shed a single tear.

Okay, okay, it was more than one, but that’s not the point. What matters is that my moment of pure patriotic pride happened not when the people representing this country were looking polished and picture perfect, but rather when their vulnerabilities, foibles and unrestricted joy were mixed together to create a completely honest, real South African picture, warts and all.

And that’s essentially what The Big Issue’s World Cup Special Edition (on sale 11 June to 9 July) is all about — acknowledging our faults and vulnerabilities at the same time as celebrating our greater achievements. It’s also about unashamedly riding that wave of national pride that hosting a mega event like this invariably brings.

That doesn’t mean we’ve ignored or glossed over the bad bits. We do take a look at the lack of support for women’s soccer in South Africa and why the country’s lesbian soccer team still has to rally against hate crimes. As for the long-term financial burden on the tax-paying public, the deflated tourism expectations and the disappointingly low number of jobs created, well, the truth is it’s simply too late to bitch and moan about that now.  We’re going to be paying through our noses for this no-expenses-spared extravaganza for years to come, so I reckon we might as well suck every bit of marrow from the World Cup bone while we can.

And there’s plenty of marrow still to be had over the next couple of weeks. As I drive to work every morning and see the growing giant vuvuzela and all the cars bedecked with upside down flags, I know there’s no way I’m snoozing through this one. I can feel it in the pit of my belly already. Can you?

Melany Bendix, Editor

SLAMMING THE SNIDENESS

I love spoken word poetry, but seldom go to performances or festivals for one (admittedly childish) reason-I find it hard to deal with the crowd. You know the type: Constantia ladies embracing their African-ness in full shwe-shwe and caftan-clad splendour; the bespectacled UCT intelligentsia in their dishevelled designer gear; the angry looking mohawked lesbians; the black guy with the fake American accent wearing the mandatory black horn-rimmed spectacles.
But the line-up at this year’s Badilisha Poetry X-Change festival just looked too good to miss. So I tried to stuff my inner snideness into a box for one night and headed to the grand old City Hall.
I was not to be disappointed.  Not only by the performing poets, but by the crowd itself.  Plenty of shwe-shwe frocks, topped off by a woman in a knitted pink beret (which I’m pretty sure I saw at Accessorise in Constantia Village), who was attempting to ululate. Plus, my favourite, “Jay-D” who introduced himself in an American drawl thick with deception, and when probed on where he was really from, said — and I swear I’m not making this up — “the universe”.
But all the posturing and awkward ululating couldn’t even taint what was the best range of performance poetry from some of the most extraordinary poets I’ve ever had the privilege to see.
D’Bi Young, the Jamaican-born dub poet wowed the audience with her warrior-like power and poise. She truly is, in her own words, “young, black and brilliant”.  Juxtaposed with her attention-demanding performance was Kwame Dawes, a prolific poet whose downplayed, relaxed style was equally powerful.
But the best was kept for last.  When introducing Anis Mojgani, the MC rattled off his long list of achievements, including that of two time individual Champion of the National Poetry Slam and the first winner of the World Cup Poetry Slam in France. From the build-up, I expected a colossal man; an eight-feet tall enigma.  Then Anis walked onto stage.  Unassuming, a bit weedy, not much more than five-feet tall and somewhat nerdily dressed with a grungy blue beanie and old-school spectacles like the ones SABC news anchor Riaan Cruywagen used to wear before he got contact lenses and was pickled in formaldehyde.
Then he spoke, and with the simple words, ‘Come closer, come into this’, he grew into the giant he is. Listening to him is like being sucked up onto a mesmerising carpet ride where you get to explore all corners of his magic realism world. Like the wizard of words he is, Anis seamlessly weaved together fantastical tales of a fisherman telling poems to his catch before rolling back their skins like bed sheets and stories of growing up in New Orleans, catching catfish and locusts and employing a giant white knight to protect against the darkness.
He made all the cynicism that usually evokes my snideness disappear. He made us forget about all the pretentiousness and come into the beauty of the moment.  He made us — scathing journos, ululating Constantia soccer moms and guys from Langa aspiring to be P-Diddy — all come closer.

Melany Bendix, Editor

For more on the Badilisha Poetry X-Change, visit:  http://badilishapoetry.com

FORGET THE RAINBOW-HUED CRAP – THIS IS THE REAL DEAL

If you’re a news junkie like me, the past few weeks would have brought you close to an overdose.

Eugene Terre’Blanche’s murder, bastard agents, “studio touching”, Jacob Zuma struggling to control his Franken-baby – it’s like we’ve been hooked up to an intravenous line of news hits. I, for one, am exhausted. I’ve also never been prouder to be a South African.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not proud of the fact that the AWB leader was murdered, nor that the ANC Youth League prez has been behaving like a buffoon (again), and I’m also not happy that Mr Visagie threatened that poor woman on national TV. I’m even less proud that extremists on both sides have dominated the debate and captured all the headlines.

But what has puffed up my chest and made me happier to be a Saffa than ever before is the way we (well, most of us at least) have done what South Africans do best: laughed.

Where else in the world could a potentially explosive situation like the AWB secretary general storming out of the now infamous studio become a national joke within a matter of hours? Twitter feeds across the country went crazy. Within 12 hours of the incident, the first “Touch me on my studio” musical remix was online, and by the next day several brilliantly funny remixes were being played on radios across the country. The beautiful irony here is that what was in fact a racially charged incident, which could have had dire consequences, united races of all ages and demographic groups because we chose to laugh at it.

Within a day of Juju’s booting of the BBC journalist, 5FM was inundated with votes for its online poll: “How does Julius Malema take his coffee: Black, Black or Bastard White”. Don’t even get me started on all the cartoons. Zapiro has been having a field day and Jeremy Nell  has had me weeping with laughter more than once lately.

Of course, underlying all the hilarity are some very serious and worrying issues. I’m painfully aware of this, as I believe most of us are. But I strongly believe that our ability to laugh at ourselves and lap up the satire that is currently our political discourse is a sign of a maturing democracy.

As a colleague of mine said: “This is doing more for nation building than that rainbow-hued crap we’ve been fed and can’t live up to.”  Through all the jokes — some of them cutting quite close to our national bones — a new degree of honesty between South Africans of all rainbow hues has emerged.  And I reckon it’s long overdue.

The jig is up

Us Capetonians have a nasty reputation for being a bit uppity, cliquey and stingy when it comes to sharing our mother city with those who are not her biological children.

We can probably debate the truth of this until the cows come home.  Us “born and bred” Capetonians (as we sometimes like to introduce ourselves) will insist that we have no sense of superiority whatsoever, while at the same time sniggering at the Vaalie family trying to order deep fried hake at Paranga.  The “outsiders” will then argue that we’re unfriendly, un-sharing and just plain snobby, and on-and-on and round-and-round it’ll go.  Or, they’ll just get really pissed off and go on a rant. Like writer and journalist Hagen Engler (one of the country’s best) did when he got so gatvol of Cape Town’s “trendoid” scene that he wrote an article entitled “10 Good Reasons Why Cape Town Can F$*#k Off”, which includes salient points like: “They’re a bunch of namby-pamby poncey glamour queens who think they live in a magazine.” Ironically, Hagen was appointed editor of FHM magazine shortly thereafter (can you hear the snobby chuckle?)

But I digress. The fact is that, although I hate to admit defeat in any area (least of all in an argument with a Vaalie), I sometimes think they’re spot on in their criticism of us.  It really is undeniable that there is a certain amount of arrogance attached to having been born and raised in a city like Cape Town.  We just can’t help it. We’re like those kids born with beauty and brains and, worst of all, we know it. It makes us infuriatingly smug and obnoxious but, at the same time, we’re the envy of all the other less-blessed kids.

So, in an attempt to break the stereotype that us Capetonians most likely deserve to be slapped with, The Big Issue’s come up with a novel idea:  get the citizens of this fair city to give up their top insider tips, compile these treasures into an easy-to-use “Real Guide to Cape Town A-Z” and share it with thousands of visitors coming to Cape Town.

Now before you shout “heresy” and “traitor” while tightening your clutch on the weather-worn map to your “secret” sunset spot wedged in-between between Bakoven and the other beach that shall remain nameless (for now), hear us out—there really is method to the madness…

And it goes like this:  If anyone seriously thinks there’s a secret spot left in Cape Town that no tourists know of or that some khaki-clad adventurer won’t “discover” in the next season or two, then they’re blissfully disillusioned.  The jig is up. And it has been since our tourism boom a good couple of years ago.  So let’s stop fooling ourselves into thinking we have some sort of rights over this city’s gems. Rather, let’s use this as an opportunity to show visitors we’re not the stuck-up, “namby-pamby poncey glamour queens” some ou from PE (chuckle chuckle) thinks we are.

Let’s share the love.  In a city as damn smart and pretty as ours, there’s plenty to go around.

*Check out more on the “Real Guide to Cape Town A-Z” campaign: http://tinyurl.com/yayeqns

Melany Bendix, Editor

A TICKING TIME BOMB

It takes a lot to shock me. I don’t say that with any semblance of pride or bravado. In fact, I think it’s a sad indictment of our society that I, along with millions of others, have become so hardened.

So for me to still be haunted by a single episode of Special Assignment aired two or three years ago, it had to be pretty shocking. And it was.

The programme investigated what was then a relatively new phenomenon in South Africa, “corrective rape”-the term invented to describe the rape of lesbian women as a means of “curing” them of the illness that must surely be afflicting them.

A group of young guys from Khayelitsha were filmed sitting in a group on the grass. They were laughing and jibing each other, making suggestive movements; the kind of thing all young guys do when they’re in a group talking about girls and bragging about their exploits. But these guys weren’t talking about their girlfriends or some girl they had a crush on. They were describing how they would rape any lesbian living in their area who came out the closet. With broad grins and crude gestures they described how they would, as a group, take it upon themselves to “put right” any woman who was “confused”, who thought “she was a man”.

They may have been bragging, as young men do; playing it up for the cameras. It doesn’t matter. That they could be so cavalier about rape, gang rape none the less, was disturbing enough.

The violent rape of gay women in South African townships is not just a bragging matter, it’s a brutal reality. According to a report by NGO ActionAid, gay support groups on the ground are reporting 10 new cases of lesbians being targeted for “corrective” rape every week in Cape Town alone. And those who consider it their duty to “cure” gay women are not stopping at rape either.

In 2006, 19-year-old lesbian Zoliswa Nkonyana was stoned to death by a mob outside her home in Khayelitsha. In 2007, Sizakele Sigasa and Salome Masooa were found raped and murdered in Soweto and in 2008 the partially clothed body of Eudy Simelane, gay rights activist and star of South Africa’s Banyana Banyana national female football team, was found in a park in Kwa Thema. She had been gang raped, brutally beaten and stabbed 25 times in the face, chest and legs.

What are our leaders doing to put an end to this barbaric practice? Not much, according to lobby groups, who say that, by turning a blind eye, government is sitting on a ticking time bomb. (Read ‘Out in Africa: the persecution continues’ in the latest edition of The Big Issue).

And this is why Minister of Arts and Culture Lulu Xingwana’s decision to stomp out of a photographic exhibition featuring black lesbians earlier this month is all the more disturbing. The photographs were taken by Zanele Muholi, a photographer who has dedicated much of her career to raising awareness of the violation of gay women. The minister reckoned Muholi’s photographs of lesbians in intimate positions did not constitute protest art, rather she labeled them “pornographic”, “immoral, offensive” and “against nation building”.

That this bigoted view is the strongest official response (albeit indirectly) to the plague of “corrective rape” in South Africa is a damning indictment on government.

Shame on them. Shame on us for allowing them get away with it.

Melany Bendix, Editor

Our first blog post

When I first read Saliem Fakir’s comment piece on Julius Malema (published in the latest edition of The Big Issue under the headline “Malema’s nobody’s muppet”), I was hesitant to run it.

I wasn’t concerned about causing controversy or stirring up debate; I just wasn’t keen on giving the leader of the ANC’s “youth” any more press. The chubby-cheeked troublemaker has been the source of media hysteria ever since he became top dog of the ANCYL in 2008, and I believe that his rise to power has been swifter because of all the attention the media has given him—some of it deserved but most of it nothing but pure hype.  (Incidentally, the joke in newsrooms lately is: What do you do when there’s a slow news day?  Call Malema for a comment.)

Malema has been doted on by the media so much that he doesn’t even have to hire a PR company; the media has inadvertently become his publicist for mahala. If you had to translate all the television, radio and newspaper coverage he’s received into advertising rands, we’re talking moolah probably equal to that of the R140-million in tenders he’s alleged to have profited from plus the multi-million rand houses he reportedly bought cash, the Mercedes Benz C63 he drives and that swanky watch the self-proclaimed “champion of the poor” proudly wears on the same wrist he thrusts into the air as he shouts “Amandla!”

But I digress. The point is I was loath to add to the media hype that has fanned the rabble-rouser’s popularity.  To be clear, when I say media hype I’m not talking about The Star or City Press newspapers’ reports on allegations that Malema has had his hands in the tender cookie jar—we need more of that kind of investigative journalism. I’m referring to the constant, superfluous coverage of Malema’s gaffes and outrageously crass behaviour.

And this is exactly the point Saliem Fakir makes in his article; we have somehow all been drawn into the spectacle that is Julius Malema. We can’t seem to help ourselves—it’s like watching a car accident that you just can’t avert your eyes from no matter how appalling the sight is.

But, as Fakir points out, while we gape, snigger or shake our heads in disgust at Malema’s crude and infantile politicking, he’s busy amassing great power and support from those who continue to rebel against the pseudo-intellectualism that characterised Thabo Mbeki’s reign.

Or, to put it in a less poncy pseudo intellectual way, while we’re all gormlessly staring at the car accident, Malema has already secretly paid off the traffic officer, tip-toed away from the accident scene and hopped into another Mercedes C-class to continue his drive straight to the gates of parliament.

The bottom line is that, when it comes to politics, Malema’s nobody’s muppet, and I think it’s about time we all stopped laughing at him for long enough to realise this.  And that is why, despite my initial hesitation, The Big Issue ended up publishing a double page spread on Malema in the latest edition.

By running the “Malema’s nobody’s muppet” article, is the Big Issue now also guilty of drumming up yet more publicity for the Youth League prez?  Or does the article achieve its author’s aim of making readers see Malema’s buffoonery for what it really is?

Let us know what you decide.

Melany Bendix, Editor